Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
Home
Just For Kids Law
Donate
  • About us
    • Our people
    • Our history
    • Introducing YJLC
    • Contact us
  • Advice line
    • Advice for children, young people, and their families
    • Advice for lawyers and other professionals
    • Recently asked questions
    • Terms and Conditions
  • Resources
    • Legal guides
    • Legal updates
    • Explainer videos for young people
    • A-Z legal terms for young people
  • Training and events
    • Past events' replay videos
    • Forthcoming events
      • Past Events
    • Youth Justice Summit
    • Youth Justice Training
      • Training for Barristers
      • Training for Solicitors
      • Training for Youth Justice Services
      • Training for other Youth Justice Professionals
  • Membership
    • For law firms and chambers
    • For Youth Justice Services
    • For individuals
    • Member directory
  • Member events
  • About us
  • Advice line
  • Resources
  • Training and events
  • Membership

Adult Co-defendant

Legal terms A-Z

Someone aged 18 or over who is accused of committing a crime with a child. (see child jointly charged with an adult).

Court Jurisdiction

If a child is jointly charged with an adult, the youth court will have no jurisdiction and the child’s case will be heard by a magistrate’s court.1

However, where the crime concerns aiding or abetting, or where the adult and child are charged with offences ‘arising out of circumstances which are the same as or connected with’ each other, both the magistrates court and the youth court have the jurisdiction to deal with the child’s first appearance.2

Interests of justice

The court will have to decide whether it is in the interests of justice for the child to have a joint trial with the adult or a separate trial in the youth court. Example of factors to be considered include:

  • whether separate trials will cause injustice to witnesses or to the case as a whole
  • the younger the youth, the greater the desirability that the youth be tried in the youth court;
  • a substantial gap in age militates in favour of the youth being tried in the youth court;
  • the lack of maturity of the youth;
  • the relative culpability of the youth compared with the adult;
  • the lack of previous convictions on the part of the youth.

If the court decides a case should be heard as a joint trail in an adult court, modifications should be made to accommodate the child.

Severance

It is possible to apply for severance so there is a separate trial for the child. The court should consider this if it is satisfied that a fair trial cannot be achieved by use of appropriate special measures or other support for the defendant.1 A severance application might be appropriate in cases concerning trafficking for example.

Subscribe to Adult Co-defendant
  • 1.a. b. Crim PD para 3G.1
  • 2. Children and Young Persons Act 1933, s18(1); s46(1)(b)
Back to top
Home
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • About us
    • Our people
    • Our history
    • Introducing YJLC
    • Contact us
  • Advice line
    • Advice for children, young people, and their families
    • Advice for lawyers and other professionals
    • Recently asked questions
    • Terms and Conditions
  • Resources
    • Legal guides
    • Legal updates
    • Explainer videos for young people
    • A-Z legal terms for young people
  • Training and events
    • Past events' replay videos
    • Forthcoming events
    • Youth Justice Summit
    • Youth Justice Training
  • Membership
    • For law firms and chambers
    • For Youth Justice Services
    • For individuals
    • Member directory
  • Member events
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site By Effusion
  • © Youth Justice Legal Centre 2021
  • Just for Kids law
  • CRAE
  • School Exclusions Hub