Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
Home
Just For Kids Law
Donate
  • About us
    • Our people
    • Our history
    • Introducing YJLC
    • Contact us
  • Advice line
    • Advice for children, young people, and their families
    • Advice for lawyers and other professionals
    • Recently asked questions
    • Terms and Conditions
  • Resources
    • Legal guides
    • Legal updates
    • Explainer videos for young people
    • A-Z legal terms for young people
  • Training and events
    • Past events' replay videos
    • Forthcoming events
      • Past Events
    • Youth Justice Summit
    • Youth Justice Training
      • Training for Barristers
      • Training for Solicitors
      • Training for Youth Justice Services
      • Training for other Youth Justice Professionals
  • Membership
    • For law firms and chambers
    • For Youth Justice Services
    • For individuals
    • Member directory
  • Member events
  • About us
  • Advice line
  • Resources
  • Training and events
  • Membership

Abuse of Process

Legal terms A-Z

When a judge stops a case because something exceptionally unfair or wrong has happened, for example if a child cannot effectively participate in their trial or the police lose a vital piece of evidence.

Proceedings can be stayed as an abuse of process in the following circumstances:

  • An inability to effectively participate: If a defendant is unable to effectively participate in proceedings despite modifications, proceedings should be stayed as an abuse of process to avoid a breach of Article 6 ECHR. However, courts are reluctant to stay proceedings because this does not provide an opportunity to identify whether a child defendant has done the acts alleged. Instead the court may decide to switch to a consideration of whether the child has done the acts alleged.
  • Common law protection of trafficking victims for offences committed as a result of being trafficked: Where the statutory defence for such victims under the Modern Slavery Act 2015 s45 fails to apply, the defence may wish to argue that a case against a trafficking victim for offences committed as a result of being trafficked is an abuse of process.1
  • Police or prosecution going back on a promise: where a defendant has been induced to believe that they will not be prosecuted, the prosecuted may be stayed for abuse of process. This is likely to occur where:
    1. there has been an unequivocal representation by those with conduct of the investigation or prosecution of a case that the defendant will not be prosecuted; and
    2. the defendant has acted on that representation to his detriment.

Staying proceedings as an abuse of process will occur to prevent a breach of Article 6 European Charter on Human Rights. A court will determine that there is an abuse of process subject to the standard of proof of the balance of probabilities.

Subscribe to Abuse of Process
  • 1. R v L, HVN, THN and T [2013] EWCA Crim 991
Back to top
Home
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • About us
    • Our people
    • Our history
    • Introducing YJLC
    • Contact us
  • Advice line
    • Advice for children, young people, and their families
    • Advice for lawyers and other professionals
    • Recently asked questions
    • Terms and Conditions
  • Resources
    • Legal guides
    • Legal updates
    • Explainer videos for young people
    • A-Z legal terms for young people
  • Training and events
    • Past events' replay videos
    • Forthcoming events
    • Youth Justice Summit
    • Youth Justice Training
  • Membership
    • For law firms and chambers
    • For Youth Justice Services
    • For individuals
    • Member directory
  • Member events
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site By Effusion
  • © Youth Justice Legal Centre 2021
  • Just for Kids law
  • CRAE
  • School Exclusions Hub